12 Reasons Why I Refuse to Follow You On Twitter
Posted Monday, November 9, 2009 · Comments
Tweeters fall into two camps:
- Those who follow everyone who follows them.
- Those who don’t.
I am in Camp #2. Once a week, I manually vet each new follower. I visit their profile and scan the first page of updates before deciding whether to follow them.
This week I collected 41 new followers, but I followed only seven of them in return. Here’s why:
1. No profile
When I’m deciding whether to follow you, the first thing I check out is your profile. If you’re too lazy to write 160 characters about yourself, why should I waste my time following you?
2. No avatar
The little tweety bird is a poor excuse for an avatar. I don’t care whether you use your company logo or a fuzzy picture of yourself. It’s not that hard to upload an image. Just do it!
3. Racy avatars
What’s with all the lingerie-clad woman who claim to be business executives? Exactly what business are they in?
4. Paranoid tweeters
Why protect your tweets when you’re in the world’s largest chat room? I don’t get that. Occasionally, I’ll follow real-life friends who publish private tweets. But only if I really, really like them.
5. Zeroes
Lots of people “squat” on a Twitter name and never, ever post a single tweet.
6. Prom queens and kings
These folks follow 10,000 others, have 10,000 followers, and one tweet. Twitter is not a popularity contest.
7. Automatons
Before I click “follow,” I skim your Twitter stream. If I see the identical automated tweet 20 times in a row, I click away. I have no problem with automated tweets or with repeated tweets, because different followers read your tweets at different times of the day. But 20 repeats? That’s overkill.
8. Get-rich-quickers
There must be a ton of people in Twitterville who fall for money-making schemes, because the get-rich-quickers appear to be taking over Twitter. Especially the ones who plaster dollar bills all over their profile background.
9. I’m just not into you
Lots of people who follow me tweet on topics about which I have absolutely no interest. It’s not that I don’t like you; your topic just isn’t relevant to me.
10. Drinkers
Some people constantly tweet about drinking, meeting for drinks, or getting drunk. Your drunken revelry doesn’t impress grownups.
11. Repliers
Some people spend all their time replying to others. Their replies consist of inane statements such as, “Me, too!” It especially irks me when repliers don’t provide context for the tweets they’re replying to.
12. Re-tweeters
These people can’t think of anything original to say, so they re-tweet everybody else’s tweets. Re-tweeting is fine, but we want to hear from you, too (unless you fall into one of the above 11 categories).
Several of my Twitter followers chimed in with their own gripes:
Pics or posts sexual in nature, “ads”, same tweet many times like on auto send…I prefer more “personal” tweets where people are relating.
If u only follow people but don’t tweet, if u mostly tweet commercials, if you are too political or extreme in any way.
- Following way more people than have followers, i.e. 1,000+ people with only 100 followers… (My take, the person is just looking to build followers.. Not interact. I prefer quality over quantity)
- Just tweet about personal information… I don’t mind if they humanize themselves with an occasional tweet about their personal life, but I really don’t want to know when someone goes to the bathroom.
- All about ME… No RTs or dialogue with others
- Get rich quick schemes, i.e. “Find out how I make $1,000 a day on the internet”
- All quotes – quotes in moderation are nice, but all quotes just says you have nothing to say yourself
- Foul language in every tweet
- Any female with a tweet that says “Come check out the pictures of me” (Porn)
How ‘bout you? Do you put limits on the tweeps you’ll follow?
When you comment, please include your Twitter handle. Hope you’ll follow me @bloggingbistro.
*Feel free to reprint this post on your own blog. I’ll be happy to e-mail you the HTML, so all you have to do is copy & paste, and the formatting will remain intact. If you reprint it, please include the following byline:
Laura Christianson, aka The Blogging Barista, owns Blogging Bistro (www.BloggingBistro.com), a Seattle-based social media marketing company.
16 Comments
November 9th, 2009 at 9:57 am
After checking out your blog on why you don’t follow certain twitterers I figured I’d follow you since our reasoning for “to follow or not to follow” is basically the same.
November 9th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
I look for a good mix of tweet types. Some original content, some retweets and some communication with others. I figure I’ll get something of interest to read in that. And I like people who interact with their network. I’m looking to build relationships, and I want to follow people who agree.
And yes, I followed you after this blog post.
November 10th, 2009 at 9:47 am
Those who have no substance to their tweets are annoying. It does not take long to identify those who retweet and post empty and inane replies in order to maintain a rolling marquee for their regular occurring inserts of self-promotion and announcements. Someone needs to let them know that they aren’t foolin’ anyone.
I agree it is nice to find a profile that has a balanced variety of quality tweets.
November 10th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
Twitter: bloggingbistro
Hi all,
Achieving balance among announcements, links, personal updates, re-tweeting, replying, and so on is easier said than done. It takes time and a great deal of trial and error. If you’re just starting out on Twitter (or even if you’ve been at it awhile and are feeling frustrated), keep at it. Here’s why:
Unlike blogs, where people often land on specific posts from your archives via a Google search, that isn’t likely to happen with Twitter. Once your front page of tweets makes its way into your archives, they’re “out of sight, out of mind.”
I hope that knowledge frees you up to experiment!
And give yourself a break when you need it. Lately, I’ve been feeling tired and headachy, so most of my tweets are pre-scheduled links to blog articles. And that’s okay. I’ll jump back into tweeting when I’m feeling perkier. If a few people get offended and unfollow me because of it, I can live with that.
Like all social media, it’s helpful to have a plan for how you plan to use Twitter. Give yourself permission to modify your plan as you go along.
Thanks, Juli, for following me. I’ll do the same for you and other commenters in return.
November 11th, 2009 at 7:59 am
Just started reading your excellent ideas and I’m hooked on your stuff! Will now follow you on Twitter too!
All the best!
Twitter.com/larrybourgeois @larrybourgeois
November 12th, 2009 at 11:30 am
Excellent post, and not just because we think alike. I think newbies need to understand that following is not automatic. I suspect services like Mr Tweet are sending more people my way, but they’re not necessarily people I would ever follow in return.
November 12th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
Twitter: bloggingbistro
threeundertwo: I’ve read article after article about how Twitter is supposed to be relational, and I believe that. But so many tweeters appear to be all about amassing thousands of followers. How can you relate to 10,000 followers… or even 1,000 followers in a meaningful way?
Lately, there have been so many spammers joining Twitter that I believe it’s absolutely essential to vet your followers before following in return. Unless, of course, you enjoy getting spam messages.
November 14th, 2009 at 6:24 am
Twitter: JanetBarclay
#1 and #2 aren’t automatic ignores for me, but there has to be something compelling in their last few tweets for me to click that Follow button, especially if they have no profile AND no avatar. Other than that, we are on the same page for sure!
December 18th, 2009 at 1:01 pm
Twitter: geoffhoff
I often will “unfollow” someone I followed if they send me an automated DM. Most are okay, but when it is a folksy come-on to buy their stuff, I get really annoyed. Whoever invented automatic DMs needs to be slapped around a little.
Not that I’d ever advocate violence.
December 18th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
Twitter: bloggingbistro
Geoff,
I sent automated DMs during my first year of tweeting, just saying “hi,” thanking the follower and alerting them to my site. The usual. Bu then I started getting irritated by other people’s “welcome” DMs, so I stopped doing it.
I’ve noticed that the auto DM fad seems to be dying down a lot. Have others of you noticed that, too?
Laura Christianson´s last blog ..A Little Toilet Humor
December 19th, 2009 at 5:08 am
Twitter: JanetBarclay
I don’t seem to receive very many auto DMs. I won’t unfollow someone who sends one (figuring everyone’s entitled to one mistake) but I will if their tweets turn out to be one self-promotion after another.
Janet Barclay´s last blog ..Green Living
December 19th, 2009 at 10:15 am
Twitter: bloggingbistro
Janet,
I am curious as to your definition of “self-promotion.” This is something I struggle with in my own use of Twitter. I pre-schedule a lot of my tweets to link to posts in my blog’s archives. The blog posts usually don’t promote a product or service because they’re informational, but they do indirectly promote my business.
I pre-schedule them because I get very busy during the day managing clients’ accounts, and don’t always have the time or energy to interact with my followers. So, some days you’ll see a lot of replies and RTs from me, and other days, it’s mostly teasers that link to posts on my blog.
Would you consider that too self-promotional? Like everyone else, I’m trying to decipher the best balance for my tweets.
Readers… your input?
Laura Christianson´s last blog ..A Little Toilet Humor
December 19th, 2009 at 10:39 am
Twitter: geoffhoff
Very quickly, because I’m on the way out the door, but I think self-promotion in itself is a good thing, as long as the self doing it has created a relationship with those they’re promoting to. You have to be in communication beyond your sales pitch to have that relationship. When I follow someone and they put out fifteen tweets in a row in very quick succession, all promotion products, I unfollow them fairly quickly. If I follow someone who responds to me occasionally, who occasionally says fun things, then promotes a page or product, I am much more willing to not only keep them around, but click on their links.
December 19th, 2009 at 11:02 am
Twitter: JanetBarclay
Laura, I agree very much with Geoff. Tweeting to announce a blog post is expected, and in my case, that’s how I know people have something new for me to read. (I had to stop subscribing to all but a few by RSS due to information overload.) But five tweets announcing the same post can be a bit annoying. And people who only tweet to advertise their products or services are just a step away from spammers, in my eyes.
Janet Barclay´s last blog ..Green Living
January 3rd, 2010 at 3:09 pm
Twitter: yourlocalfoods
I don’t automatically follow back, but I do still review every new follower.
The straight number builders will unfollow me within a week, it seems, so there’s some auto-regulation there.
I’m on twitter for a broad topic (food), but do follow a few eclectic people as well.
So far, I’m in “mingle” & “be yourself” mode & learning so much, so fast, it’s exciting.
January 3rd, 2010 at 3:52 pm
Twitter: bloggingbistro
James,
Reviewing new followers is a great idea. I’ve noticed that a substantial number of new followers to the accounts I manage are either spammers or get-rich-quickers. For this reason, I do NOT use an auto-follow system.
Mingling and learning is a fantastic way to begin on Twitter. You learn so much just by listening.